Skip to content
EPTAPRINT

Technical comparison

The six technologies compared

Stated values for each process. The tolerances shown are typical as-built values; for critical features we apply targeted post-processing.

Comparison of EptaPrint's industrial 3D printing technologies
SpecificationFDMMSLASLSMJFCFCLPBF
ProcessFused Deposition ModelingMasked StereolithographySelective Laser SinteringMulti Jet FusionContinuous Fiber FabricationLaser Powder Bed Fusion
Max build volume350 × 350 × 450 mm353 × 196 × 350 mm330 × 330 × 565 mm380 × 284 × 380 mm300 × 300 × 300 mm400 × 400 × 400 mm
Dimensional accuracy±0.6 mm up to 100 mm, ±0.75% above±0.3 mm up to 100 mm, ±0.3% above±0.3% (minimum ±0.3 mm)±0.3 mm up to 100 mm, ±0.3% above—±0.2% (minimum ±0.1–0.2 mm)
Minimum wall thickness3 mm1 mm—1 mm——
Minimum feature——0.5 mm—0.8 mm0.75 mm
Layer thickness0.04–0.5 mm0.025–0.300 mm0.1 mm0.08 mm—0.02–0.06 mm
Materials in catalog118261On request
Best forFunctional parts, tooling and high-performance polymersFine detail, appearance finish, gauges and mastersShort runs and complex geometries without supportsProduction runs of end-use nylon partsMetal replacement and structural toolingMetal parts with complex geometries

Selection guide

Which 3D printing technology to choose

A rule of thumb to get your bearings. At the quote stage we still check geometry, material and quantity against your CAD.

FDM

Functional parts, tooling and high-performance polymers

The widest material range (from PLA to PEEK and Ultem), a build volume of up to 350 × 350 × 450 mm and low cost on standard materials.

FDM details

MSLA

Fine detail, appearance finish, gauges and masters

50 μm pixels and 25 μm layers: the choice for appearance prototypes, small parts and smooth surfaces ready for painting.

MSLA details

SLS

Short runs and complex geometries without supports

Near-isotropic Nylon PA12 (85–90%), no supports to remove, batches of 10 to 500 parts at a stable unit cost.

SLS details

MJF

Production runs of end-use nylon parts

A 380 × 284 × 380 mm build volume filled with many parts per build, near-isotropic PA12, PA11, PP and TPU: the choice for runs from tens to thousands of parts.

MJF details

CFC

Metal replacement and structural tooling

Continuous carbon fiber co-extruded in the matrix: up to 900 MPa tensile strength, with strength comparable to aluminum for load-bearing jigs and structural components.

CFC details

LPBF

Metal parts with complex geometries

Laser melting of metal powder: internal channels, lattices and assembly consolidation where CNC machining cannot reach, with machining on the functional surfaces.

LPBF details

FAQ

Frequently asked questions

The questions we are asked most often about which additive process to use.

It depends on function, material and quantity: FDM for functional parts, tooling and high-performance polymers (PEEK, Ultem), MSLA for fine detail and an appearance finish, SLS for support-free short runs in Nylon PA12, MJF for production runs of end-use nylon parts, CFC for structural metal replacement with continuous fiber, metal 3D printing when the part has to be metal. At the quote stage an EptaPrint engineer reviews the CAD and recommends the best technology and material combination.

Yes, it is common: CFC or FDM tooling and MSLA appearance prototypes in the same order. FDM, MSLA, SLS and CFC run in our labs in Brescia, and MJF and metal complete the offer, so the project stays with a single supplier and a single technical contact.

SLS in Nylon PA12 is nearly isotropic (85–90% of the strength in every direction), while FDM is strongest along the build plane but allows higher-performance materials such as PEEK, Ultem and carbon-filled nylon. For multidirectional loads on complex geometries we recommend SLS; for high temperatures or chemical resistance, FDM in a high-performance polymer.